Considering drivers’ suit as class-action will set risky precedent: Uber attorney says
An attorney for app-based ride-hailing service Uber argued in San Francisco federal court on Thursday that it would be preferable not to consider three drivers' complaint as class-action suit.
Three Uber drivers have sued the company, contending they should be considered as employees and not as contractors. Reclassifying drivers as employees means Uber would have to provide them all facilities and protections prescribed under California's employment law.
The plaintiffs claim they should be entitled to reimbursement for expenses like fuel and vehicle maintenance. Currently, Uber drivers have to bear all those costs themselves.
But, Uber attorney Theodore Boutrous argued that a better procedure would be to first have a trial on the three drivers who filed the suit, instead of allowing a massive class action that would set a risky precedent.
If the court allows the suit to proceed as a class action, it could cover as many as 160,000 drivers in California and give plaintiffs significant leverage to negotiate a settlement.
Uber is one of the fastest-growing rise-sharing companies, with operationg in nearly five dozen countries. It has an estimated value of more than $40 billion.
A California labor commissioner has already ruled that an Uber driver is an employee, and not an independent contractor.
- U.S. Senate to discuss $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, Nevada stands to win big
- Shortlist of affordable electric motorcycles available for US consumers
- Hyundai Ioniq Electric tops GreenerCars’ 2021 “greenest” list; Ram 1500 TRX ranked “meanest” vehicle
- Pennsylvania casino representatives urge state lawmakers to limit VGTs & ban illegal skill gaming
- Hyundai announces battery leasing accord to trim down EV prices, coordinate reuse
New Zealand News
- Tesla to design & build affordable EV in China: Tom Zhu
- First deliveries of all-electric Porsche in Australia to take place this weekend
- Crown Resorts suffers record six-month loss due to COVID-19 closures
- Australia’s Crown Resorts 'not suitable' for Sydney gaming license: Inquiry Commission
- What Does Phasing Out Cheques Tell Us About Finance in New Zealand?
American gaming and hospitality giant Boyd Gaming...Read More
An American citizen who had boasted in front of an...Read More
Pushing the long-awaited Chicago casino project...Read More
A study was conducted to evaluate the effect a...Read More
Tech biggie Google’s recent filing with the US...Read More